Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries in the Navy: A Systematic Review

  • Shanghai University of Sport
  • Shanghai Shangti Orthopaedic Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to critically review the results of recent studies that investigated the epidemiology of noncombat-related musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) in the Navy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted of three major databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane) to identify epidemiological studies on MSIs in the Navy. Study selection and risk of bias assessment were conducted. Results: The overall prevalence of MSIs ranged from 12.69% to 48.81%. And the prevalence of head and face injuries, upper extremity injuries, spine injuries, chest injuries, and lower extremity injuries were 0.11%–0.66%, 0.53%–11.47%, 0.75%–12.09%, 0.43%–0.95%, and 0.4%–21.17%, respectively. For the specific MSIs, the incidence ranged from 0.03/1000 person-years to 32.3/1000 person-years in the Navy and Marines. The ankle-foot, lumbopelvic, knee and lower leg, and shoulder were identified as the most frequent location for MSIs. Conclusion: This systematic review summarized that the Navy population had a high prevalence of MSIs. And different risk factors for MSIs varied from different anatomic locations. This systematic review also provided valuable information on MSIs for sports medicine specialists.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1605435
JournalInternational Journal of Public Health
Volume67
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • epidemiology
  • incidence
  • musculoskeletal injuries
  • navy
  • prevalence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries in the Navy: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this