摘要
Objective: Despite oncology providers’ significant roles in patient care, few studies have been conducted to investigate oncology providers’ understanding of financial toxicity. This study aimed to explore oncology providers’ perceptions and practices relating to the financial toxicity of older cancer survivors in China. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted. Individual interviews were conducted with 14 oncology providers at four general hospitals and two cancer specialist hospitals in China. Qualitative data was analyzed using descriptive coding and thematic analysis methods. Results: The perceptions of participants about the financial toxicity of older cancer survivors include (1) older adults with cancer are especially vulnerable to financial toxicity; (2) inadequate social support may lead to financial toxicity; and (3) cancer-related financial toxicity increased the risk of poor treatment outcomes. The interventions to mitigate its negative effects include (1) effective communication about the cancer-related costs; (2) improving the professional ability to care for the patient; (3) cancer education program as a way to reduce knowledge gaps; and (4) clinical empathy as an effective treatment strategy. Conclusion: Oncology providers perceive that older cancer patients’ financial toxicity plays a key role in increasing the negative effects of diagnosis and treatment of cancer, as well as possibly worsening cancer outcomes. Some potential practices of providers to mitigate financial toxicity include utilizing effective cost communication, improving professional ability in geriatric oncology care, and promoting further cancer education and clinical empathy.
| 源语言 | 英语 |
|---|---|
| 页(从-至) | 9433-9440 |
| 页数 | 8 |
| 期刊 | Supportive Care in Cancer |
| 卷 | 30 |
| 期 | 11 |
| DOI | |
| 出版状态 | 已出版 - 11月 2022 |
| 已对外发布 | 是 |
联合国可持续发展目标
此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:
-
可持续发展目标 3 良好健康与福祉
指纹图谱
探究 'Financial toxicity among older cancer survivors in China: a qualitative study of oncology providers’ perceptions and practices' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。引用此
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver