跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

What information can we gain from the quality appraisal of guidelines with physical activity recommendations for cancer patients?A systematic review using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools

  • Xue Zhou
  • , Yujie Yang
  • , Conghui Li
  • , Shanshan Gu
  • , Weiqian Hou
  • , Xigui Lai
  • , Liwen Zhai
  • , Yi Zhu
  • Zhengzhou University
  • University of Toronto
  • Shanghai University of Sport

科研成果: 期刊稿件文献综述同行评审

9 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

Purpose: There has been growing amount of evidence supporting the benefits of physical activity (PA) on oncological patients’ cancer-related health outcomes. Although guidelines on cancer rehabilitation are widely available, the varying quality and practical applicability limited the clinical application of PA recommendations. To assist the future development of guidelines, in this systematic review, we evaluated the quality and applicability of current cancer rehabilitation guidelines with PA recommendations and synthesized PA recommendations for the oncological population. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro, EMBASE, and guideline repositories to identify guidelines with PA recommendations for cancer patients from 1 May 2016 to 1 June 2022. The quality of included guidelines was appraised using the tools “Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II” (AGREE II) and AGREE-REX (Recommendation Excellence). PA recommendations were synthesized from the guidelines. Results: Sixteen guidelines were extracted. The AGREE II domain “clarity of presentation” obtained the highest score, while “applicability” received the lowest, ranging from 33.33% to 98.58%. The AGREE-REX domains “values and preferences” and “implementability” generally scored lower and ranged from 45.83% to 74.17% and 55% to 88.33%, respectively. Eight high-quality guidelines were identified, and the included PA recommendations were extracted. Conclusion: There were some disparities in the quality of the included guidelines. Methodological weaknesses were commonly observed in domains “applicability,” “values and preferences,” and “implementability”; particular attention should be given to these domains when developing future guidelines. Furthermore, this analysis indicated that more rigorous, high-quality studies are needed to generate evidence for supporting PA recommendations and provide guidance on research gaps in the field of cancer rehabilitation.

源语言英语
期刊论文编号97
期刊Supportive Care in Cancer
31
1
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 1月 2023

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 3 - 良好健康与福祉
    可持续发展目标 3 良好健康与福祉

指纹图谱

探究 'What information can we gain from the quality appraisal of guidelines with physical activity recommendations for cancer patients?A systematic review using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此